Schlagwort: Brüssel

  • EU conference speaks up for kids online rights

    ‘Building a child-friendly Europe: Turning a vision into reality’ – this was the objective the Council of Europe discussed with its partners at a conference in Monaco in late November 2011. Chaired by Princess Caroline of Monaco, around 200 representatives from governments and civil organisations debated topics such as justice, migration and violence against children. One special focus this year was on children and new media.

    „It is vital that children and youths are involved on all levels in the consultation about their rights“ said Janice Richardson, coordinator of the Insafe network, in the workshop titled ‘Making children the masters of the game: data protection and the new media environment’. To further boost youth participation in online matters, she added, European Schoolnet has developed the Pan-EU Youth project and will soon be appointing youth ambassadors so that young people can report about their experiences on the internet and can be sure that policy makers listen.

    Further objectives of the workshop included a discussion on children’s rights on data protection (that is, for example, the minimum age requirement in online environments), data conservation of children’s online activities, data abuse and the general need to remove children’s traces on the internet. Some speakers emphasised the need for privacy options by default for children.

    Other topics on the conference agenda included ‘Empowering children through learning: democratic citizenship and human rights education’ and ‘Children’s rights start at home: strong families for strong children’. The conference was a follow-up to a 2006 conference in which the Council of Europe programme ‘Building a Europe for and with children’ was launched.

    The delegates assessed where progress has been made on the issues identified earlier. The overall feedback was positive: „The protection of children’s rights has been improved in important policy areas,“ a speaker of the Council of Europe stated, however adding: „Despite the progress achieved, many challenges remain, while new threats to children’s rights have emerged.“

    Further information is available from the conference website.

     

    Article from saferinternet.org

  • Kids on Facebook – privacy first!

    The fact that kids under 14 are not allowed to join Facebook does not mean they are not present on the network. They often appear in image galleries published by their proud parents and they are sometimes even shared not only with “friends” but with larger audiences. Just recently, the Californian Social Media giant has even made it possible for expecting mothers to share their sweet anticipation in their profile settings. This is not always in the interest of the offspring and can even be risky, bloggers and social media groups point out.

    „Especially young women often exchange their profile picture for an image of their child“, says the author of the Austrian blog „Phänomen Facebook“. But the youngsters also appear on images in the newsfeed, stroking their first pet or learning to cycle, sometimes even with their names tagged. Given the age restrictions of Facebook, and the fact that this in almost all cases happens without the consent of the child, is not only legally questionable but also raises moral issues.

    „Also children have a right to privacy and data protection“, explains the blogger. Parents should publish images of their children only when they are older than 14 and with their consent. „Should the kids be younger, it is advisable to either not post their images at all or only those images that do not violate the interests of the children“, says Lukas Feiler, legal and IT expert. Which, of course, is a matter of private opinion and taste.

    This problem has also become apparent on YouTube over the last few years. Here, parents have uploaded videos showing their kids in embarrassing situations just to get a laugh. Some of these clips have fetched millions of clicks and could be embedded and downloaded by anyone. The repercussions for the unasked stars in their later lives cannot be predicted. Equally, on Facebook, the kid pics are shared with about 130 „friends“ – which is the average number of “friends” each Facebook user has. Legally, this can be called public in many countries (such as Austria), says Lukas Feiler.

    But also for mothers-to-be it is not advisable to announce their growing belly online – though it is, of course, understandable that young women want to share this exciting phase of their lives. However, it has to be considered that these news might not be warmly welcomed by employers and colleagues (although they will obviously find out in due course). There is, of course, also the slight possibility that the pregnancy might have an unlucky ending: a lot of questions and undesired phone calls could be the result.

  • „Facebook-parties“ – a few clicks between fun and drama!

    Invitations via Facebook have lead to escalating parties in various countries over the last few months, mostly because the hosts had forgotten to make the event private. In some instances, several thousands of people had accepted the invitation, leading to massive police operations in residential areas and cordoned-off neighbourhoods. In early June, a girl by the name of Thessa in Hamburg, Germany, wanted to celebrate her 16th birthday – she went into hiding after 1,600 revellers arrived in her neighbourhood.

    „This is a new form of youth culture“, Ralf Steger, Minister of the Interior of the German state of Northrhine-Westphalia, told the German press agency dpa. After recent riots at a Facebook party in the German city of Wupptertal, however, he advised to thoroughly check the privacy settings when announcing a bash over the social net.

    As soon as an invitation goes live via Facebook, it can easily go viral and unleash a snowball effect. The parents of the girl from Hamburg, for example, found out about the skyrocketing number of guests and quickly cancelled the party. By that time, however, the party had been reposted and spread over other online channels such as Twitter, and more than 15,000 people had already „confirmed“ they would attend.

    Despite public announcements that the party was called off, still one in ten showed up – wearing party theme shirts and singing „Where is Thessa?“. According to the Associated Press, eleven people were detained, one police officer was injured, a dozen girls wearing flip-flops cut their feet and two small fires had to be extinguished. „Nonetheless, the party was a hit“, police spokesman Mirko Schreiber confirmed.

    Last autumn a girl from Sydney, Australia, was in for an even worse drama. Within only a few days, her invitation had fetched 200,000 confirmations from potential party goers. Her party announcement, also sent out via Facebook, included related private details such as address and was swiftly reposted by an anonymous „friend“. On the announced day however, the police patrolled the neighbourhood and no reveller saw her house from the inside. Legislation differs from country to country, but most often costs for the police operation can be transferred to the party host.

    eSafety experts recommend to instead send party invites via e-mail and only to close and trusted friends. If done by Facebook, however, the number of guests can be restricted. Click „Create an event“ – be careful not to send your private data or location of your home in an open invitation! It’s advisable to not give a phone number at all. Uncheck „Anyone can view and RSVP (public event). RSVP here meaning: „Please respond (répondez, s’il vous plait)“. Before clicking „Guests can invite friends“, make sure that you really only invite people you trust. Leave „Show the guest list on the Event Page“ checked – it gives you a good overview of people who have already accepted to come.

  • Belgian helpline is live!

    The Belgian National Awareness Centre Clicksafe.be has today launched its safer internet helpline. Esafety specialists of various professional backgrounds are offering fast and direct advice on cyber-bullying, grooming, data protection and other eSafety issues. The service addresses especially youngsters, but also parents and teachers are asked to get in touch in case of online issues.

    „People who have trouble on the internet can contact us via four different channels“, says Childfocus spokesman Dirk Depover. There is the e-mail address clickhelp@childfocus.org, an online form, the phone number 02 / 475 44 00 and the number 0470 / 44 44 00 that answers to text messages. „Our services are offered anonymously of course“, adds Depover.

    All questions are answered with the utmost care by schooled experts who together with the caller try to find a solution. Possible issues arising could be: „A picture of me I don’t like has turned up on the internet! What can I do?“ or: „My child is bullied via text messages! How shall we react?“ Kids are encouraged to save clicksafe.be among their favourites and install an e-button that will go live soon and directly sends them to the service.

    The launch of the new helpline will be accompanied by an on- and offline media campaign addressing children, teachers and parents alike. Over the summer, around 100,000 stickers, 10,000 posters and 20,000 bookmarks will be disseminated in Belgium.

    Contact:

    Website: http://www.clicksafe.be/helpline/fr_BE

    Email-address: clickhelp@childfocus.org

    Phone: 02 / 475 44 00

    Text message: 0470 / 44 44 00

  • Re:publica – German digital rights society announced

    Following countries such as Netherlands and France, also in Germany plans for the foundation of a digital rights organisation have been made public. Markus Beckedahl, one of the organisators of the blogger conference re:publica, will announce its establishment this Wednesday on the opening of the conference in Berlin. The issue of online rights and censorship has been discussed recently – only last week, the German government has withdrawn from a policy of blocking child online abuse websites.

    „We would like to offer a kind of construction kit for online campaigning“, tells Beckedahl the magazine Der Spiegel. Other fields of interest of the organisation comprise copyright issues, open data, internet blockades, lobbying transparence and net neutrality. „We want to create an open and free digital society“ says the text on their domain – their website is scheduled to go live this Wednesday as well.

    Also the European dimension is important to Beckedahl: „I could imagine to work together with the Dutch organisation „Bits of Freedom“ and „Quadrature de Net“ from France.“ Both organisations have been dealing with digital citizenship for quite a while. But also in other European countries digital rights organisations are active.

    Only last week, the German government has withdrawn its policy to block websites containing online child abuse material. After fears of spreading censorship on the internet and an alleged lacking efficiency – the blockades could be easily doged – the government has now announced to delete these websites. The move has met with satisfaction among many digital rights activists, nevertheless many still fear an ongoing erosion of web freedom by political parties.

    image: timtim.com free non-commercial use

  • UN – Nur Ökolandbau zukunftstauglich

    Nicht die konventionelle Landwirtschaft kann den Hunger einer wachsenden Weltgemeinschaft stillen, sondern der Ökolandbau. Dies weisen die Vereinten Nationen in einem kürzlich erschienen Bericht nach, der sich auf aktuelle Studien beruft. Binnen zehn Jahren, so das Papier, kann die Nahrungsproduktion verdoppelt werden – und dies nachhaltig und mit durchweg positiven Effekten speziell in den ärmsten Ländern.

    Erdnussernte in Malawi
    “Die konventionelle Landwirtschaft bedarf teurer Energiezufuhr, heizt die Erderwärmung an und ist anfällig für Klimaschocks”, sagte Olivier De Schutter, UN-Sonderbeauftragter für das Recht auf Ernährung und Autor des Berichts. Neue wissenschaftliche Studien zeigten, dass ökolandwirtschaftliche Methoden dem Einsatz von chemischen Düngern in jeder Hinsicht überlegen seien, speziell in ungünstigen klimatischen Lagen und Terrains.

    „So zeigten Ökolandbauprojekte in 57 Entwicklungsländern einen durchschnittlichen Anstieg der Ernteerträge um 80 Prozent, in Afrika allein sogar um 116 Prozent“, so De Schutter. In 20 afrikanischen Ländern konnten die Erträge sogar binnen lediglich 3 bis 10 Jahren verdoppelt werden.

    Malawi etwa hatte vor einigen Jahren noch ein gewaltiges Subventionsprogramm für chemische Dünger auf den Weg gebracht. Nun wird verstärkt in den Ökolandbau investiert. Ergebnis: Die Maisernten sind von 1 Tonne auf 2 bis 3 Tonnen pro Hektar gestiegen – rund 1,3 Millionen bitterarme Menschen profitieren.

    Je mehr in das Wissen der Farmer investiert wird, desto mehr verzichten sie auf Pestizide, heißt es in dem Papier. So haben eine Reihe von Ländern den Einsatz von Pflanzengiften in Reis- und Baumwollplantagen massiv zurück gefahren. Mit verheißungsvollen Resultaten: China, Indien und Pakistan verzeichneten 4 bis 14 Prozent höhere Erträge in der Produktion von Baumwolle.

    Durch den Einsatz von natürlichen Mitteln – geeigneten Bäumen, Pflanzen und Insekten – kann auf Pflanzengifte und chemische Dünger im Anbau komplett verzichtet werden. Die Böden werden so geschont und können mehr produzieren. Doch auch die Ressourcen des Farmers werden geschont. Natürliche Dünger werden auf der Farm produziert, ein teurer Zukauf von chemischen Zusätzen ist überflüssig. Entscheidend sei das Know-How: „Ökolandbau ist wissensintensiv“, sagte De Schutter.

    So sei es besonders an Staaten und Multiplikatoren, das Wissen im Ökolandbau an die Farmer zu vermitteln und durch geeignete Politiken zu fördern. „Die Unterstützung lässt derweil noch zu wünschen übrig“, beklagt De Schutter. „Dabei werden wir im Jahr 2050 9 Milliarden Menschen ernähren müssen. Spätestens bis dahin müssen wir die effizientesten Landbaumethoden massentauglich gemacht haben.“

    Foto: Erdnussernte in einem Studienprojekt in Malawi. (Foto: Wikipedia, creative common license)

    Quelle: Lars Dittmer, BOS-Deutschland

  • Should teachers add their pupils on Facebook?

    „Add“ or „ignore“ ones pupils on Facebook – this is the question the Austrian newspaper „Die Presse“ currently deals with in its online presence. Experts recommend an organic, nevertheless consistent approach that takes aims and personality of the respective teacher into account. They point out that teachers are often anxious of social media.

    “Teacher should use Facebook following their pedagogical philosophy”, says Barbara Buchegger of the Austrian Initiative “Safer Internet”. It is however highly recommendable to stay consistent: Either you add all your pupils who send you a request or you ignore them all.

    Buchegger adds that teachers should not mix their professional sphere and their personal sphere. Some use Facebook as a tool to provide consultation to their pupils – some consider Facebook a part of their private lives. It is also on Facebook possible to divide information flows and keep both spheres separate: people can be added to lists to receive more information or less.

    According to a study Buchegger has conducted, 35 percent of the Austrian teachers use Facebook, 37 percent of those are “friends” with their pupils. Most teachers however are too anxious of social media. However: “If you don’t post embarrassing messages, nothing can be used against you“, says Buchegger, reassuringly.

  • New research project tackles grooming

    The process of grooming – online sexual abuse – is being further investigated through a two-year research project called ROBERT: Risktaking Online Behaviour Empowerment through Research and Training. Nine European research institutions and NGOs work together to clarify what makes young people vulnerable to digital harassment. The innovative approach will not only include interviews with victims of grooming, but also with perpetrators.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3XKmKvw2gQ

    „At first we collect existing research from different languages and try to figure out why there is such diverging data on this topic across Europe,“ says Lars Lööf, from the expert group Cooperation of Children at Risk, which is also coordinating the project. The next steps of the project will include a set of interviews, in a trusted environment, with young people who have experienced online abuse. „We want to determine what the conditions were under which the young people became victims of grooming,“ says Lööf.

    Focus group interviews will then be conducted afterwards to further elaborate the conditions for online sexual abuse. They will concentrate on young people who are said to be particularly vulnerable to grooming, e.g., youngsters who live in alternative care, in institutions or with foster families, as well as young people with a disability or with same-sex preference or transgender identity. „We want to find out how they manage the challenges modern technology puts on them and where vulnerabilities in their online conduct arise,“ explains Lööf. Overall, around two hundred people between the ages of fourteen and eighteen years will be interviewed.

    The ROBERT project will also conduct interviews with the perpetrators themselves. Around twenty people will be questioned who have already been convicted of online offences- again in a trusted environment. The aim is to find out if there are any specific characteristics in the online conduct of young people that make them particularly susceptible to sex offenders. By uncovering strategy patterns of perpetrators, the researchers hope that clear protection recommendations can be formulated.

    „The project is designed to bring more light to the process of grooming and will serve to empower the victims of online sexual abuse,“ confirms Lööf. ROBERT was launched in June 2010 and its first results are already available through an online database. A final report and a conference are scheduled for May 2012 in Berlin.

    ROBERT is funded by the European Commission’s Safer Internet Programme. It is managed and coordinated by the Expert Group for Cooperation on Children at Risk (EGCC) in partnership with the University of Tartu (Estonia), Linköping University (Sweden), the University of Edinburgh (UK), Kingston University (UK), Save the Children Denmark, Save the Children Italia, Innocence in Danger in Germany, and Stellit International in The Netherlands and Russia.

    Find more info on ROBERT in this pdf

  • Filtering Tools do not live up to their promise

    The most filtering tools for harmful online content on the market have a very low effectiveness – given five pages of harmful content, most tools block less than four. This is the key result of a study called SIP Bench II – „Benchmarking of parental control tools for the online protection of children“. Among the 31 tested programs – 26 for PC, 2 for mobile phones and 3 for game consoles – there was no tool that achieved the overall top score of 4 points. The test results have been made available in an online database.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-52IB9Ilfg

    „I would only use the tools as additional means, but not completely rely on them“, says Jérôme Valette, a scientist who works for the SIP-Bench study. His team has examined filtering tools since 2009 and has now published the first results. Besides the effectiveness of the tools, the researchers checked their functionality, their usability and their security – that is, if a youth can easily undo or get around the online barriers erected by the tools.

    There are several factors that boost or reduce the impact of the tools. For instance, the language used by the system – the English spoken tools are more effective than those that are run on Polish, German, French, Italian or Spanish machines. Also the type of content and its form has an effect: Porn and adult content are filtered more effectively than racist content or pages related to self damage, anorexism or mutilation. „Traditional“ websites are more likely to be found and blocked accordingly than web 2.0 content such as blogs or Facebook posts.

    For the other categories, the programs achieved better marks than for their effectiveness. As to their functionality, the report states, all the tools allowed for blocking content according to categories and setting up profiles for users with different needs. As to their usability, most tools seemed to be either to complicated to configure or very reduced, which partly has an impact on the success of the filtering. The report points out that the configuration „is key to the product“.

    „Tools are ok, raising awareness is better“, reports Jérôme Valette. „Still, parents need to negotiate with their children what is harmful content and how they treat it“. For those who think a tool might be useful, more results are yet to come: SIP-Bench 2 will be finalised in 2012 and further findings will be published in six months-intervals. The study was commissioned by the European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, in the framework of the Safer Internet Programme, to Cybion Srl and Stiftung Digitale Chancen, under the coordination of INNOVA Europe S.à.r.l.

    The database of the project can be found HERE

    More information on SIP-Bench is available HERE

  • What Teenagers think of Social Networks

    „Privacy and social networks do not sit easily together“: this was an opinion expressed in a series of video interviews with young people at the Safer Internet Forum 2010 in Luxembourg. The youngsters questioned, Europeans aged between 14 and 17, reported that they use different social networks for various purposes. They are also aware of possible problems arising from their usage. //blog article on saferinternet.org

    An insight into how teenagers use SNS – Monta from Latvia

    “Messaging, emails, it takes a pretty long time”, says Monta from Latvia. Using nine different social network sites however, she is rather an exception. Most youngsters name Facebook as their favorite social network, being the platform with the most users worldwide. But also networks with strong national penetration are popular with young people, such as HI5 in Portugal. “Everybody in Portugal has an account there”, reports Francisca.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcKyFQS_8vA&feature=player_embedded

    Most of the youths use social networks to keep in touch with their friends. But social networks also serve other purposes – Monta for example uses them for school and education, Konstantinos from Greece for online gaming. When it comes to the topic of privacy, the youngsters close in on a definition: “privacy is something that is only mine, it is something that nobody else can touch”, states Petr from Czech Republic.

    But is it possible to have privacy in social networks? When you’re smart, you can use them and still keep your privacy, suggests Petr. Linus from Sweden, however, is more skeptical. “When you really want something to be private, you shouldn’t post it online”, he suggests.